Legislators err in consideration of constitutional amendment

Dear Rep. Ryckman, Sen. Wagle, Sen. Denning and others, the problem is not the Kansas constitution, and the problem is not the Kansas courts. You have had options for dealing with our school funding situation. You didn’t have to pass a disastrous tax plan, which many told you would blow a hole in our state’s budget. You did not have to sit through the two years of the block grant without addressing our new school funding formula, which is now causing you to deal with the latest court decision as you enter the 2018 election year. You did not have to rely on a faulty application of the “Successful Schools Model” which failed even a basic common sense test of whether that model could arguably be a basis for school funding adequacy. You tried amending the constitution in 2016. You tried defending the tax policy in 2016. Kansas voters attempted to clear any remaining confusion by voting to retain our Supreme Court justices and replacing about a third of our legislature. The reason you are experiencing deja vu is that you keep repeating your errors. Public education advocates understand the hole we find our state in, but we also understand the critical importance of providing an adequate education to every Kansas child. That is a monumental task, but it is one that cannot be abandoned. We understand you find yourselves in a difficult situation, and we are open to creative solutions, but trying to undo your constitutional obligations to Kansas children is not a solution.

“‘It seemed pretty simple,” the House speaker said. ‘It says that the Legislature shall provide ‘suitable’ provisions for K-12. Our Supreme Court the last 25 years and the Legislature, regardless of who the governor is, regardless of who is in control, have been debating and arguing and cannot agree on what that word means.’”

http://cjonline.com/…/kansas-house-speaker-ron-ryckman-expe…

See also http://www.kansascity.com/…/editorials/article185321433.html
“But the numbers don’t lie: Kansas has been underfunding its schools for years.

“The court’s ruling was unanimous. It’s also only fair to point out that Wagle wasn’t complaining in 2012 when Brownback signed tax cuts that were to cost the treasury $2.9 billion over five years.

“Wagle said it would immoral for her to vote for a tax increase for additional school funding when other state services are hurting. But Wagle herself this year proposed a 2 percent across-the-board cut in spending, which her fellow senators rejected.

“Wagle and other Kansas leaders must face the constitutional reality that another boost in school spending must occur, as contrary it may be to their conservative principles.”

Originally posted on Facebook November 22, 2017

No Comments Yet.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.